| I think both of these folks (Rachel & Pat) are extreme speaekrs using emotion (especially Pat) to share their view. I do agree that Rachel judges people by race. It's convenient, popular and she articulates her view well. Pat is just as emotional about his view but articulates his view with race as well.In my view, at this moment in our countries time, intentional placement of non-white/females/over 40 people is appropriate. I've reviewed the hearings of Sotomayor and although this candidate is not among this countries best, this candidate is at the right place at the right time. This country seems to need to look at a person to deem them appropriate for the job. That's just where we find ourselves today.In the end, Rachel is more correct than Pat but they both embarrass me as an American. Rachel with her comment The last 109 Supreme Court Justices were white, this one needs to be non-white view and Pat with his White men are discriminated against . Money use to drive extreme views now it's ratings. I now understand why other countries believe America has lost its magic.
|
